Posts by Nuxwin

  • We urgent need php 7.2 for some customers, how to achieve this ?

    Quote from viper_iii

    "Working on it" and my adapted reading "I really don't care about some of the base of users" (because they bitch too much!?!)
    Unfortunately - IS Speaking to me - in fact to everyone when its posted, just the way it is, but I figure has every right.

    My sentence


    Sorry but you misread something ;) I didn't target you in any way, and my sentence wasn't what you've quoted. The people that I've targeted are those which are always complaining, even though, they don't have any idea of the necessary work. Those people which, generally speaking, use i-MSCP for their personal sites and that don't want support us much with non-free plugin and so on. Do you support us with non-free plugin? Yes... So what?


    Timeline


    Giving a date is easy, respect it is another story. If you look at my facebook, or even twitter, you'll see that we are effectivelly working on the next version, including plugins. You can also have a look at our github (commits). That's not like if we just say: We're working, without doing anything behind the scene...


    Finally, don't forget that: i-MSCP development isn't just about providing a PHP UI. It is about providing a software able to manage various 3rd-party software. There are the "base" software (Apache, postfix, bind, proftpd...), but not that all. Think that for each plugin, we need also deliver a backend layer to manage the targeted software, for instance: SpamAssassin.


    Finally, when you take that all together, you can understand that this is not a little work. We are in a transitional period.


    PhpSwitcher plugin


    Regarding the PhpSwitcher plugin, the most difficult part for us is to maintain the patches for each versions. Without those patches, you cannot compile these versions under Ubuntu/Debian. That why we want now rely on packaged PHP versions. We just need a bit time to switch on.

  • We urgent need php 7.2 for some customers, how to achieve this ?

    Quote from DZII

    I hope you did not take my message as saying I am leaving i-mscp . I left ISPconfig to use i-mscp and I have paid for plugins for i-mscp and I have no problem paying for plugins. I Do use my i-mscp install for Business use. We have just found sites run a lot better on php 7.2 and up since site code has been updated This is nothing against i-mscp. You guys are active see you guys are logged in all the time We just needed to move sites from i-mscp for time being.

    No, don't worry. My message was for Neptun which posted bullshit. I removed his post and I've banned him.

  • We urgent need php 7.2 for some customers, how to achieve this ?

    Quote from Iceman

    That seemed like a rather drastical step. :/The migration and so on would be too much (for me) just to bypass the waiting time for the next release.

    Dont get me wrong, I want 7.2 or better 7.3 too, but thats a bit of an overkill.^^

    Most of time, people reacting like this are those which expect all for free, with a very low respect for the developers. I don't care much about those people because most of time, they don't understand anything to buisness and so on... They can just go away ;)


    Neptun You get now banned. You're not free to propagate your bullshit on our forums:

    1. You're "leaving" us because the community is not more active? That only an assumption from your side. There are plenty of people that keep an interest to i-MSCP, even though, there is not a new release every months... The community is less active on our forums because we are in an intermediate period, that is, a development period.
    2. There are people able to understand that we need gain our life, even if i-MSCP core is free.
    3. We are working with many companies which use our control panel for real business, not only for personal use... ;)


    So what? Not happy with our schedule? Not happy with our decisions such as the one regarding plugin selling? That's not a problem for us, just go away.

  • iMSCP behind a firewall

    MiGro94


    As I can see, you didn't posted any SSL vhost for the mgw94.de site. Default behavior for Apache when you are asking for inexistent site (here the mgw94.de SSL version), is to serve the first vhost found. So here, because there is no SSL vhost file for the mgw94.de site, Apache serve the SSL version of the mgross.org site. Regarding the redirection, this can be due to the HSTS feature which, I think, is enabled for the mgross.org SSL site.


    If you do not want that behavior, you need to install the ServerDefaultPage i-MSCP plugin, or enable SSL for the mgw94.de site.


    BTW: Because the browser cache HSTS redirects, you'll have to flush them after enabling SSL for the mgw94.de site, else, you'll be still redirected to the mgross.org ssl site...