Re;
And when you install imscp, the entry in the roundcube config file is generated as smtp.control.myinterface.info, right?
BTW: What is a TLD for you? Give an example. For me a TLD is such as .com, .net ...
Re;
And when you install imscp, the entry in the roundcube config file is generated as smtp.control.myinterface.info, right?
BTW: What is a TLD for you? Give an example. For me a TLD is such as .com, .net ...
Display MoreHabe ich das nicht geschrieben?
[hr]
Der kommt einfach nicht damit klar, dass in der Config eine unter subdomain angelegt wird, sprich smtp.fqdn.deinedomain.tld
Wie gesagt ich kenne mich damit nicht so aus aber wenn man nach der simplen menschlichen logik geht kann ich nicht eine subdomain des FQDN wieder als FQDN verwenden ...
I-MSCP wird smtp.fqdn.deinedomain.tld deswegen anlegen, da in der Installationsroutine meist schon eine Subdomain als FQDN hinterlegt ist ... sprich füttert man den Installer mit dem FQDN hans.10centstock.info wird für den SMTP folgendes als FQDN eingetragen: smtp.hans.10centstock.info
Gibt man dem Installer jedoch direkt eine TLD also z.B.: 10centstock.info wird für den SMTP einfach smtp.10centstock.info eingetragen und alles kann korrekt aufgelöst werden.
Ich habe es zwar noch nicht getestet aber ich denke er würde auch, wenn ich bei der Installation test1.test2.test3.10centstock.info als FQDN verwende folgendes für den SMTP eintragen: smtp.test1.test2.test3.10centstock.info
Ich denke mal das mehrfach subdomains nur schlecht oder garnicht für den Mailversand aufgelöst werden können.
Evtl ein Fehler im Installer dass die so angelegt werden?
Falls ich mich irre klärt mich einfach auf.
LG
Haze
I thinks that you are wrong. Now, before further explanation, I want know more about your installation:
1. Are you using the DNS server provided by i-MSCP or are you managing your DNS entries on an external DNS server ?
2. What are the values of these parameters in your imscp.conf file:
3. What is the result of the following command on your system
Replace <BASE_SERVER_VHOST> with value from the imscp.conf file.
I would fix that problem faster so, I hope you will answer faster too.
Thanks for using i-MSCP
So for me there is no problem since RC1.2
You can see http://forum.i-mscp.net/Thread…allation?pid=9133#pid9133
Re ;
Yes, now it's when you update that the bug occurs in some contexts, depending of involved modules when rebuilding customer files... It's my fault and I'm sorry. I was tired today. I prefer fix all that tomorrow to avoid to release billions of fast bugfixe releases...
Thanks you for using i-MSCP.
Ok then, I'll be crazy now...
I'll fix tomorrow.
Fixed in the 1.1.0-rc1.2 fast bugfix release. See the announcement.
Thanks for using i-MSCP
Fixed in the 1.1.0-rc1.2 fast bugfix release. See the announcement.
Thanks for using i-MSCP
It's with great pleasure that we announce the immediate availablity of i-MSCP 1.1.0-rc1.2, which is a Fast bugfix release.
This release addresses the following issues:
Tickets
Furthermore, all languages files were synchronized with the last available versions on Transifex.
We would like to remind you that this version should not be used in a production environment, and that any bugs found should be reported on our issues tracker.
Feel free to test this new version and get in touch with us about any improvement that you would like see integrated.
See http://forum.i-mscp.net/Thread…released?pid=9084#pid9084 for more information about new features and fixes integrated in the 1.1.0-rc1 release.
Download:
https://sourceforge.net/projec…les/i-MSCP%201.1.0-rc1.2/
Thanks you for using i-MSCP.
Display More
Hi guys, I'm installing the recently released RC1 in a brand new OS squeezy, and at the end it shows me this error
The panel works fine, but I don't know when or where it will fail
What does it mean (the error)?
Thanks
Victor
Hello ;
Already reported and the fix is in master. A fast bugfix release is in the road.
Thanks for using i-MSCP
Hello ;
I'll check.[hr]Update: Bug confirmed. I'll fix now. And of course, Fast bugfix release will come...
Update: Reason found...[hr]This bug occurs only on new install. Of course, I 'll fix and release.
i think packages from packagist take some time. had the same problem.
Packagist takes a little time for first install. but it's not about 1 hour. It's more about 1 minutes max on real servers. I'll retry on my test server with slow connection (max 600kb). I'll compute time.
BTW: packagist.org only host packages metadata. Package are pulled from github.