hello, good evening, everyone, I have been researching online, and I've tempting to ditch me the idea to replace apache by LiteSpeed system, the reason is simple, say it works 9 times faster than Apache and there are various opinions good about it.
My question is, is it possible to replace apache by LiteSpeed,??
Everything is possible, but atm there's no support for litespeed.
Everything is possible, but atm there's no support for litespeed.
apology not understand what you mean when you say "atm", which is "atm"?
Sorry for my bad English, I speak Spanish 
atm = "At The Moment" 
atm = "At The Moment"
ok thank you very much for your answer, I will continue with the apache meantime
Greetings!,:D
ok thank you very much for your answer, I will continue with the apache meantime
Greetings!,:D
Hello ;
Here, you are talking about performances for serving static files. In that case, you should use Nginx as frontal + Apache. An addon will come ASAP for Nginx.
In term of performance for static files, we get in order:
Well, the implementation for nginx is on the road but I've some priorities such as the next i-MSCP release on which I'm currently working on. I've not do any test but I known that some of us (such as c0urier) that are already using NGINX + Apache with i-MSCP for performances reasons.
Thank you for using i-MSCP.